Differences in plasma testosterone levels related to social status are more pronounced during mating than nonmating season in the tropical bat <i>Saccopteryx bilineata</i> (greater sac-winged bat)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Testosterone (T) concentrations often covary strongly with mating activities in temperate-zone vertebrates. Recent studies suggest that males of tropical species experience lower and year-round constant T levels. Here we studied plasma T concentrations in a tropical mammal with a seasonally invariant social system, the greater sac-winged bat ( Saccopteryx bilineata (Temminck, 1838)). Colony composition remains almost stable throughout the year, although mating is restricted to only a few weeks each year. Males follow one of two mating strategies: they either defend a territory with a female group (harem) or live peripheral without females. First, we compared T within the same individuals between seasons, asking whether T levels are higher during mating season. Second, we tested whether T levels are related to social status, and third, whether T correlates with parasite infection because of an immunosuppressive effect. We found high individual T variations. Testosterone was elevated during the mating season only in harem males and was, on average, higher than in peripheral males. We found no correlation between T and parasite infestation. Although reproduction is seasonal in S. bilineata, T concentrations showed no pronounced seasonal pattern, probably because colony members form long-term relationships and live in a year-round stable social system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".