MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326390883 · doi:10.7227/ijmee.39.2.4

Stagnation Pressure, the Bernoulli Equation, and the Steady-Flow Energy Equation

2011· article· en· W2326390883 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Vakil, Sheldon Green

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInviscid flowBernoulli's principleStagnation pointStagnation pressureMechanicsStagnation temperatureEnergy–depth relationship in a rectangular channelPhysicsReynolds numberPotential flow around a circular cylinderFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsClassical mechanicsChézy formulaOpen-channel flowTurbulenceHeat transferMach number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Bernoulli equation is arguably the most commonly used equation in fluid mechanics. For the incompressible, inviscid flow along a streamline, the Bernoulli equation states that the total head of the fluid (the sum of the pressure head, velocity head, and elevation head) is constant. Neglecting elevation changes, the Bernoulli equation therefore limits the maximum pressure coefficient in a flow to 1, which occurs at stagnation points in the flow. Normally, the action of viscosity causes the total head in a fluid to decrease in the streamwise direction, which means the stagnation-point pressure coefficient is less than 1. However, at low to moderate Reynolds numbers, where viscous forces are most significant, stagnation-point pressures exceed 1. This counterintuitive result is explained by reference to the shear work term in the steady-flow energy equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mechanical Engineering EducationSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207