MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326448479 · doi:10.1021/jp304729s

Solid-State <sup>91</sup>Zr NMR Characterization of Layered and Three-Dimensional Framework Zirconium Phosphates

2012· article· en· W2326448479 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemical Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCASTEPZirconiumZirconium phosphateSolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceCharacterization (materials science)Cluster (spacecraft)Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyHeteronuclear moleculeMaterials scienceNMR spectra databaseChemistryChemical physicsNanotechnologyInorganic chemistrySpectral lineComputational chemistryDensity functional theoryNuclear magnetic resonanceOrganic chemistryPhosphatePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Layered and open framework zirconium phosphates (ZrPs) have many current and potential applications in the areas of catalysis, sorption, protonic conductors, solar energy storage, crystal engineering, and ion exchange. Characterization of ZrP-based materials is important because understanding the relationship between the properties of these materials and their structures is crucial for developing new uses and for improving their performances in current applications. However, local Zr environments in many ZrPs have not been characterized directly by 91 Zr solid-state NMR (SSNMR). This is because 91 Zn ( I = 5/2) is an unreceptive nucleus with many NMR unfavorable characteristics, leading to low sensitivity. In this work, the local environments of the zirconium centers in several ion-exchanged derivatives of layered α-ZrP (K + -, Li + -, Co(NH 3 ) 6 3+ -ZrP) have been probed directly using 91 Zr MAS, static quadrupolar echo, and/or quadrupolar Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill NMR. Several layered and three-dimensional framework zirconium phosphates (ZrPO 4 -DES8, ZrPO 4 -DES1, ZrPO 4 -DES2, ZrPOF-pyr, ZrPOF-Q1, ZrPOF-EA, and ZrPOF-DEA) with novel structures were also examined. Theoretical calculations using the CASTEP and Gaussian model cluster approaches were also performed in order to provide insights into the observed spectra. In addition to 91 Zr SSNMR, 31 P, 13 C, and 19 F SSNMR spectroscopy was also utilized to characterize the above-mentioned materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it