MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326551643 · doi:10.1541/ieejias.133.37

Evaluation of Experimental Result and Utility of Flux Modulated Type Magnetic Gear

2012· article· en· W2326551643 on OpenAlex
Yûji Enomoto, Norihisa Iwasaki, Masashi Kitamura, Masahiro Mita, Masahiro Masuzawa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic gearNon-circular gearTorqueRotor (electric)Torque densityCore (optical fiber)Noise (video)Magnetic coreFlux (metallurgy)Transmission (telecommunications)Magnetic fluxAutomotive engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringSpiral bevel gearControl theory (sociology)Materials sciencePhysicsComputer scienceMagnetic fieldElectrical engineeringElectromagnetic coilMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A prototype of the flux-modulated type magnetic gear is manufactured and tested to evaluate its efficiency and torque transmission characteristics. According to the test results, the maximum torque transmission is proportional to the gear's size and the flux density of each rotor. The efficiency of the gear is dependent upon core material and core shape. As for the gear made for trial purposes, the efficiency of 99% was obtained in the maximum. The prototype gear obtained comparative advantages over mechanical gears with respect to efficiency and noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it