Abstract 2331: Role of MMP expression in the effect of Plk4 on cell migration and invasion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Plk4 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor in mice (Ko et al, Nature Genetics, 2005). Plk4+/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) spontaneously immortalize in culture and become tumorigenic by passage 15 (Rosario et al, PNAS, 2010). We investigated the secondary genetic alterations associated with tumorigenicity. Early passage (P3) Plk4+/+, P3 Plk4+/− and late passage (P15) Plk4+/− MEFs were compared by genome-wide expression array (Illumina). When differentially expressed genes were organized by biological function, increased cell proliferation and death (p=2.13E10-1.31E02, p = 2.52E07-1.14E02 respectively), and decreased cell motility (p = 3.74E07-1.27E02) in the P15 MEFs were predicted. An independent array analysis comparing tumorigenic (T) to nontumorigenic (NT) Plk4+/− MEFs showed a pattern of altered gene expression predictive of decreased motility in the T MEFs. These results suggested the hypothesis that Plk4 modulates cell motility. To directly test this hypothesis in functional assays we measured cell spreading, scratch-wound healing and transwell migration through Matrigel; in all these assays P3 Plk4+/− were inferior to P3 Plk4+/+ MEFs. We hypothesized that altered MMP expression was one mechanism for the difference observed in migration, and tested this by comparing MMP-13,-10 and -3 expression as shown in the Table. Plk4 status was associated with altered expression of MMPs; in particular, MMP-13 expression was confirmed to be significantly reduced in P3 Plk4+/− compared to P3 Plk4+/+ MEFs by RT-qPCR. Our results indicate that Plk4 regulates cell motility and invasion. One potential mechanism is through upregulation of MMP-3,-10, and -13 expression. To further elucidate the molecular mechanisms of Plk4 related carcinogenesis we will next directly determine the effect of Plk4 on MMP activity and correlate this with migration and invasion. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2331. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2331
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".