MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326565318 · doi:10.2514/6.2011-262

Analysis of Fatigue Loads of Wind Turbine Blades Subject to Cold Weather Conditions Using a Finite Element Model

2011· article· en· W2326565318 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Patricio Lillo, Curran Crawford

Bibliographic record

Venue49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCold climateTurbine bladeStructural engineeringBlade (archaeology)Finite element methodBendingSparComposite numberWork (physics)Environmental scienceMaterials scienceTurbineEngineeringGeologyComposite materialMechanical engineeringClimatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada has aggressive targets for introducing wind energy across the country, but also faces challenges in achieving these goals due to the harsh Canadian climate. One issue which has received little attention in other countries not experiencing these extremes is the behavior of the composite blades in winter conditions. The scope of this work is to study blade fatigue response in cold climates using a blade nite element model. First, temperature dependencies of material properties including fatigue coecient were estimated. Secondly, it was found that the natural frequencies of a 1.5 MW wind turbine blade are not signicantly altered at cold temperatures. Additionally, cold temperatures slightly increase stresses in the composite blade skin when the blade is loaded, due to an increase in stiness. Cold temperatures also lead to higher cyclic apwise bending moments acting on the blade. However, this increase was found not to aect the lifetime fatigue damage. Finally, it was found that the cold climate as seen in Canada improves the fatigue strength of saturated composite materials. For the materials, the predicted fatigue damage of the triaxial fabric and the spar cap layers in cold climate is half that of the fatigue damage at room temperature. This is caused solely by the temperature dependence of the fatigue coecient b which requires further experimental verication to validate the numerical results of the current study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace ExpositionSame topicFatigue and fracture mechanicsFrench-language works237,207