Arterial Port Catheter System Placement Using a Translumbar Aortic Route
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Implantable ports for arterial infusion hold promise in a growing number of clinical applications, including regional chemotherapy and gene therapy. Percutaneous placement of arterial infusion ports has been described clinically; however, existing sites of access pose unique anatomic challenges. The feasibility of translumbar aortic placement of a port-catheter system for long-term arterial infusion was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight swine underwent placement of a percutaneously implantable arterial port-catheter system using a translumbar aortic approach for catheter placement. The tip of the catheter was positioned in the left or right hepatic artery and the port reservoir implanted in the paraspinal subcutaneous tissues. Patency and position of the port-catheter system were assessed at 7 to 10 days and 28 days. The insertion procedure was modified in two animals by introducing tissue adhesive around the catheter to prevent dislodgment. RESULTS: Immediate technical success was achieved in 6 of 8 animals (75%). Catheters were dislodged into the aorta in two animals on the day of the procedure, extravascular in four animals and intra-aortic in one animal by day 10. One animal died at 21 days of sepsis. The port-catheter systems remained functional at 28 days with catheters positioned within the left or right hepatic artery in three animals, including two animals in which the catheter had been fixated within the paraspinal soft tissues with tissue adhesive. CONCLUSIONS: A translumbar aortic route for percutaneous placement of arterial infusion port-catheter systems is feasible in swine and holds potential as an ancillary access site in a clinical setting if the obstacle of catheter fixation can be overcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".