MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transient Outward Current Inhibition by Propafenone and 5-Hydroxypropafenone in Cultured Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes

2001· article· en· W2326645413 on OpenAlexaff
Sean A. Cahill, Lorrie A. Kirshenbaum, Gil J. Gross

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropafenoneMyocyteInternal medicinePharmacologyPatch clampPotassium channelMedicineIC50EndocrinologyChemistryElectrophysiologyIn vitroBiochemistryAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The antiarrhythmic agent propafenone and its primary electropharmacologically active metabolite, 5-hydroxypropafenone, are known inhibitors of cardiac myocyte repolarizing currents. We recently documented potent propafenone inhibition of the transient outward potassium current (Ito) in human atrial myocytes from patients in the newborn and infant age range. In the current study we characterized ventricular Ito inhibition by propafenone and 5-hydroxypropafenone in neonatal myocytes enzymatically isolated from 2-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat pups. Using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique in ventricular myocytes kept in primary culture for 1-4 days, we observed comparably potent Ito inhibition by both agents, yielding 50% maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 2.1 +/- 0.5 and 1.5 +/- 0.2 microM for propafenone and 5-hydroxypropafenone, respectively. Ito blockade by both of these agents was time, concentration, and voltage dependent, but use independent. There was no drug effect on steady-state voltage dependence of Ito inactivation, or on the time course of Ito recovery from inactivation. These findings are consistent with an open channel-blocking mechanism as suggested by other models. We conclude that both propafenone and 5-hydroxypropafenone are potent Ito inhibitors in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes, with potencies exceeding those demonstrated for propafenone in adult rat ventricular myocytes or in human atrial myocytes from patients of all ages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular PharmacologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207