Delivery of immunogens to mucosal immune system using an oral inactivated cholera vaccine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oral vaccines have several attractive features; however, due to several challenges, to date, only a limited number of oral vaccines are licensed. Over the past two decades, several oral vehicle delivery systems have been developed to address these challenges and deliver antigens to the target cells in the mucosal immune system. While the size of vehicle delivery systems, the quantity of components in the vehicle formulation, the dose of administration, and even the type of animals species, are important aspects in development of a suitable oral vaccine, our results showed that entrapment of inactivated Vibrio cholera, a component in the structure of Dukoral vaccine into oral vehicle delivery systems, is able to induce a more rigorous humoral immune response in the systemic compartment. We further investigated the mechanism of Dukoral vaccine as a potential stimulator in induction of immune response by immunizing TLR-2-, TLR-4-, MyD88- and Trif-deficient mice. We are hopeful that these findings will lead to development of more precisely-designed oral vaccines in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".