Participation Profile of Adults with Class III Obesity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the time use and associated perceptions of performance, importance, and enjoyment for adults in treatment for obesity classified as severe. Adults ( n = 128) from obesity treatment programs in Ontario, Canada, completed a survey that included the Occupational Questionnaire, a measure of the distribution and meaning of time use across occupations. Descriptive analysis and differences between groups based on obesity severity, age, and being limited by obesity were completed. Participants spent the most time in daily living activities and less time in work, recreation, and rest activities. Participants reported doing activities that they enjoy and perform well is important. The distribution of time across occupations for participants in this study is similar to that of adults living with chronic health conditions. No significant differences in time use and associated meaning were found between groups based on body mass index or being limited by obesity. More time was spent in work activities for participants aged 25 to 54 years. Obesity interventions that support participation in existing occupations and enable participation in recreation and rest occupations should be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".