MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326770164 · doi:10.1021/om1008499

Carbon−Hydrogen Bond Oxidative Addition of Partially Fluorinated Aromatics to a Ni(P<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Synthon: The Influence of Steric Bulk on the Thermodynamics and Kinetics of C−H Bond Activation

2010· article· en· W2326770164 on OpenAlexaff
Jillian A. Hatnean, Robert Beck, J.D. Borrelli, Samuel A. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAdductSynthonMesityleneMoietyAnthraceneSteric effectsMedicinal chemistryOxidative additionSolventStereochemistryPhotochemistryTolueneOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of (P i Pr 3 ) 2 NiCl 2 with the anthracene adduct (THF) 3 Mg(η 2 -C 14 H 10 ) in THF provides the anthracene adduct (P i Pr 3 ) 2 Ni(η 2 -C 14 H 10 ). In aromatic solvents (benzene, toluene, mesitylene) a thermal equilibrium exists between the bis(phosphine)nickel(0) anthracene adduct, (P i Pr 3 ) 2 Ni(η 2 -C 14 H 10 ), and the monophosphine solvent adduct, (P i Pr 3 )Ni(η 6 -solvent). The reaction of (P i Pr 3 ) 2 Ni(η 2 -C 14 H 10 ) with 1,2,4,5-C 6 F 4 H 2 affords the C−H activation product trans -(P i Pr 3 ) 2 NiH(2,3,5,6-C 6 F 4 H). The thermodynamic C−F activation product is not obtained even after hours of heating at 100 °C. Similar reactions with 1,2,3,5-C 6 F 4 H 2 and pentafluorobenzene produce the desired C−H activation products, trans -(P i Pr 3 ) 2 NiH(2,3,4,6-C 6 F 4 H) and trans -(P i Pr 3 ) 2 NiH(C 6 F 5 ), respectively, in >95% yield. The reaction with 1,2,3,4-tetrafluorobenzene did not produce an observable C−H activation product. Unlike previously reported analogous C−H activation products with Ni(PEt 3 ) 2 synthons, the bulkier Ni(P i Pr 3 ) 2 moiety did not provide observable mononuclear or dinuclear η 2 -fluoroarene adducts. Solutions of Ni(COD) 2 with 2 equiv of triisopropylphosphine and 1,2,4,5-C 6 F 4 H 2 reacted to give the 1,5-cyclooctadiene insertion and rearrangement product, (η 3 -C 8 H 13 )Ni(P i Pr 3 )(2,3,5,6-C 6 F 4 H). The same reaction with 1,2,3,5- and 1,2,3,4-C 6 F 4 H 2 afforded analogous compounds, which demonstrates that C−H bond activation is kinetically accessible at room temperature with 1,2,3,4-tetrafluorobenzene despite the presence of a single ortho -fluorine substituent adjacent to the site of activation. The room-temperature reactions of the C−H activation products (P i Pr 3 ) 2 NiH(Ar F ) (Ar F = 2,3,5,6-C 6 F 4 H; C 6 F 5 ) with 3-hexyne provided a mixture of the alkyne adduct (P i Pr 3 ) 2 Ni(η 2 -EtC≡CEt), with the liberation of Ar F H, and the insertion product (P i Pr 3 ) 2 Ni(CEt═CHEt)(Ar F ), even in the presence of excess fluorinated aromatic Ar F H. The reaction of (P i Pr 3 ) 2 Ni(η 2 -EtC≡CEt) with 1,2,4,5-C 6 F 4 H 2 resulted in no reaction at room temperature, but heating at 50 °C provided the insertion product (P i Pr 3 ) 2 Ni(CEt═CHEt)(Ar F ) as the initial product, followed by the product of reductive elimination, 1,2,4,5-C 6 F 4 H-CEt═CHEt. In contrast, the reaction of (PEt 3 ) 2 Ni(η 2 -EtC≡CEt) with 1,2,4,5-C 6 F 4 H 2 at 80 °C slowly produced (PEt 3 ) 2 Ni(CEt═CHEt)(2,3,5,6-C 6 F 4 H), but very little 1,2,4,5-C 6 F 4 H-CEt═CHEt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207