MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2326776861 · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000008

Examining the use of facilitation within guideline dissemination and implementation studies in nursing

2014· review· en· W2326776861 on OpenAlexafffund
Elizabeth J. Dogherty, Margaret B. Harrison, Ian D. Graham, Lisa Keeping‐Burke

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of AlbertaQueen's UniversityOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsFacilitationGuidelineNursingPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.313
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.510
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3130.510
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0280.026
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.929
GPT teacher head0.779
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
DomainMethods
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare→Same topicHealth Policy Implementation Science→French-language works237,207→