MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326788424 · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.prev-11-b54

Abstract B54: Reproductive status at first diagnosis influences risk of radiation-induced second primary contralateral breast cancer in The WECARE Study

2011· article· en· W2326788424 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer D. Brooks, Duncan C. Thomas, Robert W. Haile, Susan A. Smith, Marinela Capanu, Jonine L. Bernstein, Roy E. Shore, John D. Boice, Marilyn Stovall, Anne S. Reiner, Leslie Bernstein, Esther M. John, Charles F. Lynch, Lene Mellemkjær, Julia A. Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Prevention Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerMedicineGynecologyRadiation therapyObstetricsCancerPopulationRisk factors for breast cancerPregnancyOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The breast undergoes changes in composition, function and hormonal milieu during puberty, pregnancy, lactation and postmenopausal involution. These changes may influence the susceptibility of the breast to carcinogens, including exposure to ionizing radiation. The Women's Environmental, Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology (WECARE) Study is a multi-center, population-based, case-control study of 708 women (cases) with asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and 1,399 women (controls) with unilateral breast cancer (UBC). Radiation therapy (RT) records were used to reconstruct the radiation dose to the location in the contralateral breast where the second cancer arose (or to the equivalent breast location for UBC controls). Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed to assess the relationship between reproductive status at first breast cancer diagnosis, RT and risk of CBC, adjusting for known breast cancer risk factors: age at (first) diagnosis, menopausal status/age at menopause at first diagnosis, age at menarche, number of full-term pregnancies, first degree family history of breast cancer, histology and stage of first primary breast cancer, and treatment (chemotherapy/hormonal therapy). Women who were nulliparous at first diagnosis and exposed to ≥1 gray (Gy) to the contralateral breast, had a higher risk of CBC than unexposed nulliparous women (RR=2.2, 95% CI 1.2–4.0). An increased risk was not seen in RT exposed parous women (RR=1.1, 95% CI 0.8–1.4). Women treated with RT who later became pregnant had a greater risk of CBC compared with unexposed women who also became pregnant (RR=6.0, 95% CI 1.3, 28.4), though these results were based on small numbers. The effect of radiation on risk of CBC did not vary by number of pregnancies, history of breast feeding or menopausal status at the time of first breast cancer diagnosis. These results suggest that RT may be associated with an increased risk of developing a second breast cancer in nulliparous but not parous women. Women who become pregnant after first breast cancer diagnosis may also be at an increased risk of CBC. It is possible that RT could be the initiating event, leading to preneoplastic cellular changes that are then promoted by the hormonal changes of a subsequent pregnancy. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2011;4(10 Suppl):B54.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Prevention ResearchSame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207