MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326802317 · doi:10.1002/phbl.20000560503

Bund‐Länder‐Kommission: Mehr Eigenverantwortung für die DFG/Fällt das Hochschullehrerprivileg?/Grundlagenforschung im All/Juniorprofessoren statt Habilitanden?/Rüstungskontrolle: Technologisch fragwürdig, politisch gefährlich/Wissenschaftspublikationen „frisch vom Autor”/USA: Helle Zukunft für Advanced Light Source/Erleichterter Zugang für israelische Wissenschaftler/Aus für Gammastrahlen‐ Satelliten/Gegen Dialog zwischen Wissenschaft und Religion/Raumfahrt ohne Nutzen für Kristallzucht/Rummel um neuartigen Wasserstoff/Frankreich: SOLEIL – Licht am Horizont/Schweiz: Förderungsprofessuren des Nationalfonds/Quantenoptik: Fock‐Zustände kontrolliert erzeugt/Atomoptik auf dem Chip/Material für Linkshänder

2000· article· de· W2326802317 on OpenAlexaff
Ursula Resch‐Esser, Vera Münch, Florian Haug, Wolfgang P. Schleich, Jakob Reichel, Max Rauner, Rainer Scharf, Thomas Otto, Stefan Jorda

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysikalische Blätter · 2000
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Science and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysikalische BlätterSame topicInternational Science and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207