Strong Solvent-Dependent Preference of Δ and Λ Stereoisomers of a Tris(diamine)nickel(II) Complex Revealed by Vibrational Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, we use vibrational circular dichroism (VCD) spectroscopy to investigate the metal-centered Δ and Λ chirality of a tris(diamine)nickel(II) complex. Chiral diphenylethylenediamine is chosen as the ligand, which puts the Δ and Λ isomers of the complex in a diastereomeric relationship. X-ray crystallography indicates an equal preference of both stereoisomers in the solid state. This equal preference is also supported by the related density functional theory calculations. A comparison between the experimental and calculated VCD spectra also proves the existence of both isomers in an acetonitrile solution. However, a significant shift of the equilibrium toward the Λ diastereomer is found for the complex in dimethyl sulfoxide. This solvent-induced preference for a particular absolute configuration is hypothesized to arise from a stronger and more effective solvation of the Λ isomer. The observation that the solvent can significantly influence and shift an equilibrium between two diastereomeric forms is expected to have important implications on structural analysis and on how reaction mechanisms are rationalized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".