MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326992420 · doi:10.1094/asbcj-2012-0724-01

Suitability of the Miniature Fermentability Method to Monitor Industrial Fermentations

2012· article· en· W2326992420 on OpenAlex
Andrew J. MacIntosh, J. H. Adler, Emily B. Eck, R. Alex Speers

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMashingFermentationBrewingFood scienceIndustrial fermentationSugarChemistrySCALE-UPPulp and paper industry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malt barley breeders and maltsters often strive to improve the quality of their product by improving fermentability. Small-scale assays are often used to assess the fermentability of wort produced from malt under standardized mashing techniques. However, anecdotal reports suggest that these assays have poor correlation with industrial fermentations in addition to inconsistency between assays. There are several factors that are likely to contribute to this behavior such as pitching rate, mashing regime, fermentation temperature, barley modification, and batch size. This study aimed to isolate and examine the effect of fermentor size on wort fermentability through the use of miniature-scale (15 mL) assays fermented in parallel to industrial sized operations. These miniature fermentations were conducted at identical temperatures to their industrial scale counterparts and used oxygenated wort mashed and pitched by local craft breweries. Wort density was measured throughout the fermentations using a portable densitometer while the turbidity was assessed via spectrophotometer at 600 nm. It was found that fermentation vessel size had a significant effect on the apparent degree of fermentation; however, observed disparities were consistent between the assay and fermentor dimensions. For example, a difference in final density of 1.1 ± 0.2°P was observed between the final density of a 19.6 hL craft brewery and the miniature fermentation assay over three consecutive experiments. However, when the wort from an 8.5 hL brewpub was tested using this lab assay, no significant differences in final attenuation were found (P > 0.05). The shear generated through consumption of sugar and subsequent production of carbon dioxide was theoretically determined for each fermentation. A reduced shear generated within the shorter (miniature scale) fermentors likely influenced the yeast floc distributions and subsequent final density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it