MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327019327 · doi:10.1093/tcbh/hwq012

In Memoriam * Duncan Tanner

2010· article· en· W2327019327 on OpenAlex
P. F. Clarke, Stephen Nicholas, Stephen Brooke

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTwentieth Century British History · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOriginalityHistoryClassicsSociologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 11 February 2010, the managing editor of Twentieth-Century British History, Professor Duncan Tanner, died suddenly at the age of 51. In this issue, we offer two appreciations of Duncan’s life and work, the first by Peter Clarke, his thesis supervisor, the second by Sian Nicholas and Stephen Brooke, his co-editors at Twentieth-Century British History between 2007 and 2010. The unexpected death of Duncan Tanner at the age of only 51, from a heart condition of which few were aware, came as a great shock to all of us who knew him. He was one of the most respected historians of his generation, known not only in his native Wales or in Great Britain but internationally. An initial stolidity of manner belied his underlying warmth, just as his sheer technical accomplishment as a scholar sometimes masked the full originality of his insights. He produced ground-breaking work, especially on the rise of the Labour Party, that has fundamentally affected the way we understand its history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it