MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327096311 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-1778

Abstract 1778: Nimotuzumab, a humanized antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody, interacts with EGFRvIII

2010· article· en· W2327096311 on OpenAlexaff
María Jaramillo, Suzanne Grothé, Jason Baardsnes, M. Banville, Béatrice Paul‐Roc, Ilia Tikhomirov, Sean EL Thompson, Maureen O’Connor

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAptose Biosciences (Canada)National Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow cytometryEpidermal growth factor receptorAntibodyCancer researchChemistryApoptosisCell cultureMolecular biologyReceptorMedicineBiologyBiochemistryImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Glioblastomas frequently overexpress a variant form of EGFR, called variant III (EGFRvIII), which has an in-frame deletion of an 801-bp sequence in the extracellular domain. EGFRvIII does not bind EGF ligand but exhibits constitutive kinase activity that results in enhanced transformation, reduced apoptosis, and resistance to therapy. Nimotuzumab (Nmab) is an EGFR-targeting antibody that has demonstrated encouraging results in early clinical trials treating adult and pediatric brain tumors. Here we present data characterizing the interaction of Nmab with EGFRvIII. Methods: Binding of Nmab to the extracellular domain of wtEGFR and EGFRvIII was first characterized by SPR biosensor analysis: Nmab was captured via its Fc domain and varying concentrations of EGFRvIII and EGFRwt were flowed. Flow cytometry analysis was subsequently performed using a parental U87MG glioblastoma cell line and derivatives which were engineered to overexpress either wtEGFR or EGFRvIII. Results: Nmab bound EGFRvIII and EGFRwt with similar affinity, which was in the 10−8 M range. This KD is consistent with the previously reported affinity constant of Nmab for EGFRwt (Telavera et al, 2009). Binding was further analyzed by flow cytometry. Nmab bound both EGFRwt and EGFRvIII expressed on the surface of parental U87MG, U87MG EGFRvIII and U87MG wtEGFR cells. Additional data concerning effects of Nmab on EGFRvIII expressing cell lines will be presented. Conclusion: Nmab binds to wtEGFR and EGFRvIII with similar affinity, which supports development of the antibody as a therapeutic for glioblastoma. In U87MG glioblastoma cells, synergistic activity of Nmab in combination with radiotherapy has been previously reported (Diaz Miqueli et al, 2009). Nmab is currently being tested in an advanced randomized study in the first line setting for the treatment of adult glioma. Nmab is being tested in combination with radiation plus temozolomide, vs radiation plus temozolomide alone, with preliminary results expected in the second half of 2010. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1778.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207