Copper Chalcogenide Clusters Stabilized with Ferrocene-Based Diphosphine Ligands
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The redox-active diphosphine ligand 1,1'-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf) has been used to stabilize the copper(I) chalcogenide clusters [Cu12(μ4-S)6(μ-dppf)4] (1), [Cu8(μ4-Se)4(μ-dppf)3] (2), [Cu4(μ4-Te)(μ4-η(2)-Te2)(μ-dppf)2] (3), and [Cu12(μ5-Te)4(μ8-η(2)-Te2)2(μ-dppf)4] (4), prepared by the reaction of the copper(I) acetate coordination complex (dppf)CuOAc (5) with 0.5 equiv of E(SiMe3)2 (E = S, Se, Te). Single-crystal X-ray analyses of complexes 1-4 confirm the presence of {Cu(2x)E(x)} cores stabilized by dppf ligands on their surfaces, where the bidentate ligands adopt bridging coordination modes. The redox chemistry of cluster 1 was examined using cyclic voltammetry and compared to the electrochemistry of the free ligand dppf and the corresponding copper(I) acetate coordination complex 5. Cluster 1 shows the expected consecutive oxidations of the ferrocene moieties, Cu(I) centers, and phosphine of the dppf ligand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it