MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327117679 · doi:10.1080/15265161.2014.957623

Right Answer, Wrong Question: Special Access, Knowledge Generation, and Clinical Trial Legitimacy

2014· letter· en· W2327117679 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher Lowry

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Bioethics · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegitimacyIntervention (counseling)Informed consentClinical trialPsychologyMedicineFamily medicineMedical educationPolitical scienceAlternative medicineLawPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I agree with Walker, Rogers, and Entwistle's (2014) recommendation to make access to an unapproved intervention outside of a clinical trial usually conditional on the patient's consent to reasonabl...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.031
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.590
GPT teacher head0.622
Teacher spread0.032 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of BioethicsSame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207