MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phenotypic variables associated with progression of disease behaviour In Crohnʼs Disease

2009· article· en· W2327124536 on OpenAlexaffabout
Smita Halder, Asem Sharaf, Joanne M. Stempak, G C Nguyen, Gordon R. Greenberg, Wei Xu, Hillary Steinhart, Mark S. Silverberg

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiseaseCrohn's diseaseEpidemiologyRetrospective cohort studyInternal medicineInflammatory bowel diseaseCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crohn's disease (CD) is characterized by a chronic and relapsing disease course which is variable in severity among patients. Accurate classification during the course of the disease is important in assessing prognosis and ensuring the appropriate treatment is administered for each subgroup. Epidemiological and genetic observations have led to the development of the refined Montreal Classification. Disease behavior, as defined by the Montreal Classification, is one measure of severity and the introduction of a time-dependent classification is an important component of assessing aggressive disease behaviour. Although many patients will have a relatively indolent and benign disease course, the subset of patients with aggressive and rapidly progressive CD are subject to significant morbidity, poor quality of life and substantial economic and health care costs. Predictors of disease progression would be useful to manage patients and identify those that may benefit most from earlier therapeutic intervention. To identify variables associated with rapid progression from B1 (inflammatory) to B2 (fibrostenotic) or B3 (internal penetrating) disease behaviour as defined by the Montreal Classification. A retrospective chart review was conducted on a cohort of 255 CD patients recruited to our IBD genetics studies between 2002-2004 who had at least five years follow-up. Date of diagnosis, age, gender, ethnicity, smoking status, extraintestinal manifestations, disease location and requirement for steroid therapy or surgery were determined. Time to progression from B1 to either B2 or B3 was confirmed using clinical records. Patients were censored at the date of disease behaviour change, or date of most recent assessment, whichever was earliest. Comparisons were made between those who had rapid progression (within 5 years of diagnosis or diagnosed as B2/B3 at baseline), and indolent progression (over 5 years or no change in behaviour). Chi-square statistics were obtained. Of the cohort, 51% were male. The proportions for age categories A1, A2 and A3 were 30%, 64% and 6% respectively. The proportions for ileal (L1), colonic (L2) and ileocolonic (L3) disease were 40%, 25% and 33% respectively. Out of 208 patients who had B1 disease behaviour at diagnosis, 49 (24%) patients progressed to either B2 or B3 within 5 years. Young age group at diagnosis (A1, A2) (p= 0.001), and disease location of either the ileum (L1) or the ileocolon (L3) (p= 0.0003) were statistically significant factors associated with rapid disease progression. Young age at diagnosis and small bowel disease location in CD are associated with progressive CD behaviour to more complex phenotypes. By recognizing disease markers of progressive CD behaviour, clinicians can better identify patients that may most benefit from therapeutic strategies to prevent more debilitating disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel Diseases→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→