Molecular Insights into Clathrate Hydrate Nucleation at an Ice–Solution Interface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clathrate hydrates are specific cage-like structures formed by water molecules around a guest molecule. Despite the many studies that have been performed on clathrate hydrates, the actual molecular mechanism of both their homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation has yet to be fully clarified. Here, by means of molecular simulations, we demonstrate how the interface of hexagonal ice can facilitate the heterogeneous nucleation of methane clathrate hydrate from an aqueous methane solution. Our results indicate an initial accumulation of methane molecules, which promote induction of defective structures, particularly coupled 5-8 ring defects, at the ice surface. Structural fluctuations promoted by these defective motifs assist hydrate cage formation next to the interface. The cage-like structures formed then act as a sink for methane molecules in the solution and enhance the stability and growth of an amorphous nucleus, which can evolve into a hydrate crystal upon annealing. These results are illustrative of how a surface that is structurally incompatible can serve to facilitate heterogeneous nucleation of a new crystalline phase. They should also further our general understanding of the formation of gas hydrates and their critical roles in various industrial and environmental processes, including carbon capture and storage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".