MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327285497 · doi:10.5114/pg.2012.29880

Myoelectric functional stomach disorders in children and teenagers with Helicobacter pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux disease

2012· article· en· W2327285497 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Monika Parzęcka, Anna Szaflarska‐Popławska, Joanna Gąsiorowska

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHelicobacter pyloriInternal medicineGastroenterologyRefluxPediatric gastroenterologyStomachDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Helicobacter pylori infection can induce disorders of myoelectric stomach functions and can have an influence on the frequency and grade of intensification of acid pathological gastroesophageal reflux (GER).The GER pathomechanism is also closely connected with stomach motor activity by affecting the tension in the lower oesophageal sphincter.Aim: The aim of the study was to try to answer whether there are significant disorders in myoelectric stomach functions in children and teenagers with gastritis and/or duodenitis coexisting with H. pylori infection and GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease).Material and methods: One hundred and one patients over the age of 3 with dyspeptic symptoms who underwent endoscopic examination of the upper part of the digestive tract, pH-metric oesophagus test, and electrogastrographic test (EGG) were qualified for the examination.Helicobacter pylori infection was confirmed in the histopathological test and/or in the urease test and urea breathing test.Results: Among the examined patients in 50 cases the result of the pH-metric test was abnormal (group A [n = 50]), and in 51 patients the reflux index was below 4% (group B [n = 51]).In the analysis of the difference in percentage of normogastria, bradygastria, tachygastria and arrhythmia appearance before and after a meal in the EGG record in patients with confirmed H. pylori infection in group A (incorrect result of pH-metric test) and in the group of children with the correct result of the pH-metric test (group B) a statistically significantly higher percentage of bradygastria was verified in StreszczenieWstęp: Zakażenie Helicobacter pylori może indukować zaburzenia czynności mioelektrycznej żołądka i wpływać na częstość oraz stopień nasilenia kwaśnego patologicznego refluksu żołądkowo-przełykowego.Patomechanizm refluksu przełykowego (gastroesophageal reflux -GER) również pozostaje w ścisłym związku z motoryką żołądka przez wpływ na napięcie dolnego zwieracza przełyku.Cel: Próba odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy istotne zaburzenia czynności mioelektrycznej żołądka występują u dzieci i młodzieży z zapaleniem błony śluzowej żołądka i/lub dwunastnicy współistniejącym z zakażeniem H. pylori i chorobą refluksową przełyku (gastroesophageal reflux disease -GERD).Materiał i metody: Do badania zakwalifikowano 101 pacjentów powyżej 3. roku życia z objawami dyspeptycznymi, u których wykonano badanie endoskopowe górnego odcinka przewodu pokarmowego, badanie pH-metryczne przełyku oraz badanie elektrogastrograficzne (EGG).Zakażenie H. pylori potwierdzono w badaniu histopatologicznym i/lub w teście ureazowym oraz mocznikowym teście oddechowym.Wyniki: Wśród 101 pacjentów u 50 chorych wynik badania pH-metrycznego był nieprawidłowy [grupa A (n = 50)], u 51 pacjentów indeks refluksowy wynosił poniżej 4% [grupa B (n = 51)].W analizie różnicy między odsetkami występowania normogastrii, bradygastrii, tachygastrii i arytmii przed jedzeniem i po jedzeniu w zapisie EGG u pacjentów z potwierdzonym zakażeniem H. pylori w grupie A (nieprawidłowy wynik pH-metrii) i w grupie dzieci z prawidłowym wynikiem badania pH-metrycznego (grupa B) stwierdzono istotnie statystycznie większy odsetek bradygastrii w grupie Ia w zapisie przedposiłko-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterology ReviewSame topicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesFrench-language works237,207