MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327465536 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100022599

DIETARY TREATMENT OF EPILEPSY. PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF KETOGENIC THERAPY. 2012. Edited by Elizabeth Neal. Published by Wiley-Blackwell. 241 pages. C$80 approx.

2013· article· en· W2327465536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elaine Wirrell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetogenic dietApproxAction (physics)EpilepsyGerontologyPsychologyMedicineNeuroscienceComputer sciencePhysicsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ketogenic diet has been used for nearly 100 years in the treatment of epilepsy.However, it has experienced a considerable resurgence in use since the early 1990's.It is now offered as an important therapeutic option in most pediatric epilepsy centers worldwide, and its use in adults with medically intractable epilepsy is rapidly growing.More recent modifications including the modified Atkins diet and Low Glycemic Index diet offer improved tolerability, and appear to have similar efficacy to the classical ketogenic diet."Dietary Treatment of Epilepsy: Practical Implementation of Ketogenic Therapy" fills an essential niche both for health care providers, parents and persons with epilepsy, providing a very practical and concise overview of several aspects of dietary therapy for epilepsy.It is edited by Elizabeth Neal, a dietician and author on the first randomized controlled study of the ketogenic diet for treatment of epilepsy, who is well-recognized internationally for her expertise in ketogenic diet therapy.The chapters are written by a panel of international physician and dietician experts.This book is subdivided into three sections:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207