Resolubilization of Precipitated Intact Membrane Proteins with Cold Formic Acid for Analysis by Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein precipitation in organic solvent is an effective strategy to deplete sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) ahead of MS analysis. Here we evaluate the recovery of membrane and water-soluble proteins through precipitation with chloroform/methanol/water or with acetone (80%). With each solvent system, membrane protein recovery was greater than 90%, which was generally higher than that of cytosolic proteins. With few exceptions, residual supernatant proteins detected by MS were also detected in the precipitation pellet, having higher MS signal intensity in the pellet fraction. Following precipitation, we present a novel strategy for the quantitative resolubilization of proteins in an MS-compatible solvent system. The pellet is incubated at -20 °C in 80% formic acid/water and then diluted 10-fold with water. Membrane protein recovery matches that of sonication of the pellet in 1% SDS. The resolubilized proteins are stable at room temperature, with no observed formylation as is typical of proteins suspended in formic acid at room temperature. The protocol is applied to the molecular weight determination of membrane proteins from a GELFrEE-fractionated sample of Escherichia coli proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".