MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327507547 · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000232

Body Mass Index as a Predictor of Complications and Mortality After Lumbar Spine Surgery

2014· article· en· W2327507547 on OpenAlex
Alejandro Marquez‐Lara, Sreeharsha V. Nandyala, Sriram Sankaranarayanan, Mohamed Noureldin, Kern Singh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsRoyal Bank of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeBody mass indexOverweightSurgeryPulmonary embolismCohortPopulationDeep veinRelative riskLumbarObesityCohort studyRetrospective cohort studyConfidence intervalInternal medicineThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: A national population-based database was analyzed to characterize the risks of postoperative complications and mortality associated with the patient's body mass index (BMI) after lumbar spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Obesity has been associated with greater perioperative complications and worsened surgical outcomes after lumbar spinal surgery. However, the stratified BMI risks of postoperative complications relative to normal weight patients have not been well characterized. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery between 2006 and 2011. Patients were stratified into BMI cohorts: normal (18.5-24.99 kg/m), overweight (25.00-29.99 kg/m), class 1 (30.00-34.99 kg/m), class 2 (35.00-39.99 kg/m), and class 3 (≥40 kg/m) obesity. Preoperative patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were assessed. The relative risks of 30-day postoperative complications and mortality for each BMI cohort were calculated in reference to the normal weight cohort using a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: A total of 24,196 patients underwent lumbar spine surgery between 2006 and 2011 of which 19,195 (79.3%) were overweight or obese. The risk for deep vein thrombosis increased beginning with overweight patients and compounded for the subsequent obesity classes. The risk for superficial wound infection and pulmonary embolism increased beginning with the class 1 obesity cohort. Furthermore, the relative risk increase for urinary tract infection, acute renal failure, and sepsis was significantly increased only among class 3 obesity patients. Lastly, there was no relative risk increase in 30-day mortality in any cohort after lumbar spine surgery. CONCLUSION: Overweight and obese patients demonstrated an increased risk of postoperative complications relative to normal weight patients. Despite these findings, a BMI 25 kg/m or more was not associated with a greater risk of mortality. Further studies are warranted to characterize the impact of postoperative complications associated with overweight and obese patients on hospital resource utilization and costs after lumbar spine surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it