Antithrombin Concentrate in Pediatric Patients Requiring Unfractionated Heparin Anticoagulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe antithrombin levels, altered unfractionated heparin effect (anti-factor Xa activity and activated partial thromboplastin time), and adverse effects post administration of a single high dose of antithrombin concentrate. DESIGN: Retrospective review. PATIENTS: Infants and children with antithrombin levels less than 50% and a subtherapeutic unfractionated heparin effect. SETTING: Quaternary care children's hospital with a dedicated anticoagulation program. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A single high dose of antithrombin concentrate was administered. Antithrombin level, anti-factor Xa, and activated partial thromboplastin times were measured post antithrombin concentrate infusion and daily until stable. One hundred twenty-one patients received 246 doses of antithrombin. Patients were described using two cohorts based on the ability to obtain exact heparin doses. Cohort 1 included all patients between January 2004 and May 2008 when complete heparin dosing was unavailable. Cohort 2 included patients from May 2008 to May 2011 when heparin dose was available. Median age and weight were 3.7 months and 4.1 kg. Mean antithrombin concentrate dose was 222 IU/kg. Mean antithrombin level increased from 0.39 to 1.20 U/mL following antithrombin concentrate administration. In cohort 2, unfractionated heparin doses to achieve a target anti-factor Xa activity pre-post antithrombin concentrate were 28 and 19 U/kg/hr, respectively, for children 12 months old or younger and 25 and 19 U/kg/hr, respectively, for children older than 12 months. There were no hemorrhagic, thrombotic, or allergic events within 1 week of antithrombin concentrate administration. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of antithrombin concentrate evaluation in children. Administration of antithrombin concentrate increases anti-factor Xa activity with lower administered unfractionated heparin doses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".