Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Japan Spastic Paraplegia Research Consortium (JASPAC) is conducting a nationwide clinical and genetic survey of patients with HSP in Japan. To date (July 20, 2011), 375 index patients with HSP from 42 prefectures in Japan have been registered. In 148 Japanese ADHSP families, SPG4 was the most common form, accounting for 47%, followed by SPG31 (4%), SPG3A (3%), SPG8 (1%), and SPG10 (1%). Meanwhile, preliminary data showed that SPG11 and ARSACS were common in Japanese ARHSP families. Since the genes in approximately 40% of ADHSP and 80% of ARHSP cases remain unknown, we aim to identify the new genes responsible for HSP. We are now searching for a novel gene responsible for ARHSP with optic atrophy and neuropathy. To date, non-Quebec patients with ARSACS have been found in the Mediterranean area, Europe and Japan. Although Quebec patients show a homogeneous phenotype, Japanese patients exhibit some atypical clinical features, as follows: slightly later onset than that in Quebec patients, absence of retinal hypermyelination, intellectual impairment, and lack of spasticity. Recently, we found characteristic MRI findings in eight Japanese ARSACS patients, who all exhibited linear hypointensity in the pons and a hypointense area in the middle cerebellar peduncles in T(2) weighted and FLAIR images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".