MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327679830 · doi:10.1190/1.3513152

Time‐lapse multi‐component seismic modeling of CO <sub>2</sub> fluid replacement in Redwater Leduc Reef, Alberta

2010· article· en· W2327679830 on OpenAlexaffabout
Taker M. Sodagar, Don C. Lawton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyComponent (thermodynamics)ReefSeismologyOceanographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Common shot multi-component ray tracing modeling was undertaken to evaluate variations in the seismic response of the Redwater reef along the 2D line across the southern margin of the reef as well as with CO2 saturation in the Upper Leduc interval zone. The input geological model was based on well data and depth-converted seismic data from the interpretation of 2D seismic lines in the area. P- wave and P-S wave Ray tracing synthetic seismic sections demonstrate similar seismic attributes for the Mannville, Nisku, Ireton, Cooking Lake, and Beaverhill Lake Formations. The Cooking Lake and Beaverhill Lake formations display positive structure below the reef in time sections due to the lateral velocity change from on-reef to off-reef, but corrected in the depth sections. Terminations and the lateral position of the Upper Leduc and Middle Leduc events are obvious on the pre-stack time-migrated section and a modest improved on the depth- migrated section. Higher amplitudes at the base of Upper- Leduc member are evident near the reef margin due to the higher porosity of the foreslope facies in the reef rim compared to the tidal flat lagoonal facies within the center of the reef. Time-lapse seismology proved showed amplitude and traveltime differences for the seismic data before and after CO2 saturation. A fairly good contrast reflection occurring at the top of upper-Leduc, top of the rim, and base of upper-Leduc near the reef edge was strong evidence to observe and monitor CO2 saturation with seismic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207