Serum drug concentrations of INH and RMP predict 2-month sputum culture results in tuberculosis patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Alberta provincial tuberculosis (TB) clinics, serum drug concentrations (SDCs) are measured in patients with human immunodeficiency virus, diabetes mellitus or at extremes of weight, or showing slow clinical response to treatment, to guide treatment. DESIGN: A retrospective review was performed of TB cases in Northern Alberta with SDCs measured from 1998 to 2013. Adequacy of SDC was based on the maximum concentration (Cmax) achieved in serum, with rifampicin (RMP) values <8 μg/ml and isoniazid (INH) values <3 μg/ml for daily dosing and <9 μg/ml for intermittent dosing considered inadequate. Clinical variables and microbiological outcomes were then compared between the adequate and inadequate groups. RESULTS: Of 134 pulmonary TB cases with SDCs for INH and/or RMP, we found a significant increase in 2-month sputum culture positivity in the cohort with inadequate concentrations of INH compared to those with adequate INH concentrations (42.5% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.0084). A similar trend was seen in the cohort with inadequate concentrations of RMP (39% vs. 21%, P = 0.0725). CONCLUSIONS: Among our study population, low SDCs of INH and, to a lesser extent, RMP, appear to be associated with reduced sputum culture conversion after 2 months of treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".