MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327728207

National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 summary.

2007· article· en· W2327728207 on OpenAlex
Donald K. Cherry, David A. Woodwell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbulatoryMedicineMedical carePhysician OfficeAmbulatory careQuarter (Canadian coin)Family medicineHealth careGeneral practiceDemographyGeographySurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This report describes ambulatory care visits made to physician offices in the United States. Statistics are presented on selected characteristics of the physician's practice, the patient, and the visit. METHODS: The data presented in this report were collected in the 2006 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), a national probability sample survey of visits to nonfederal office-based physicians in the United States. Sample data are weighted to produce annual national estimates of physician visits. RESULTS: During 2006, an estimated 902 million visits were made to physician offices in the United States, an overall rate of 306.6 visits per 100 persons. In over one-quarter of office visits, electronic medical records were utilized by physicians, while at 85.5 percent of visits, claims were submitted electronically. Since 1996, the percentage of visits by adults 18 years and over with chronic diabetes increased 40%, and during the same time period, visits increased for chronic hypertension (28%), and depression (27%). Among visits by females, a Pap test was ordered or provided more frequently than a human papilloma virus DNA test (5.6 versus 0.6 percent). Private insurance visits were more likely to include liquid-based Pap tests (6.3 percent) compared with visits using conventional or unspecified tests (3.7 percent), whereas visits utilizing Medicaid and other sources of payment were equally likely to provide conventional or unspecified, and liquid-based Pap tests. Medication therapy was reported at 636.7 million office visits, accounting for 70.6 percent of all office visits. In 2006, there were about 1.9 billion drugs mentioned, resulting in an overall 210.3 drug mentions per 100 visits. Visits to primary care physicians at community health centers were more likely to document health education compared with office-based practices, whereas diagnostic or screening services, drug mentions, and any nonmedication treatment occurred at approximately the same proportion of visits for primary care providers in both type of settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it