MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CareCredit helps make hearing aids affordable

2005· article· en· W2327773694 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Monique Spanierman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Hearing Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFirm Innovation and Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaymentPaceHealth careBusinessHearing aidFinanceProduct (mathematics)MedicineAudiologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As patients' out-of-pocket costs continue to rise, hearing care practitioners increasingly are looking to offer patients viable financial options aside from cash payment and consumer credit cards. One of the biggest players in consumer healthcare financing is CareCredit, General Electric Corp.'s Healthcare Financing Division, which has been offering a healthcare-specific line of credit product to consumers since 1987. CareCredit entered the audiology market about 3 years ago and has been adding hearing care practices and their patients at a steady pace each year, according to Terry Silance, CareCredit's national sales manager for audiology and ENT. Eligible practitioners include licensed audiologists, hearing instrument specialists, and ear, nose, and throat physicians working anywhere in the United States and Canada. Instead of buying the hearing aids that are best for them, Silance says, patients are frequently forced to opt for less expensive hearing devices because they can't afford the ones that their hearing care practitioner recommends as best suited for them. For example, a GE consumer finance study of hearing aid financing showed that the average hearing aid charge for persons using Visa or MasterCard is $1945. That compares with a 12-month, no-interest plan financing average charge of $2695 and a 48-month, low-interest plan average charge of $3192, the study found.FigureWhat's more, return rates for financed hearing aids are only 3%-4%, compared with an industry average of 15%, notes Silance. “The lower return rate also indicates that patients are happier with their selection,” he adds. PAYMENT IN TWO DAYS When a patient at a hearing care practice signs up for a line of credit with the CareCredit program, the practitioner receives full payment within 2 business days, says Silance. To enroll, patients complete a short application in the practitioner's office, which is then submitted for approval through the company's web site (www.carecredit.com), telephone, automated phone, or fax, he explains. Approvals typically are made within minutes, adds Silance. The CareCredit program is a line of credit that can be used for repeat healthcare purchases. Patients can finance up to $25,000 with no-interest plans up to 18 months and with low-interest payment plans that can extend as long as 48 months. The low-interest option carries a 9.9% interest rate, which is lower than most credit cards, he notes. “The practice benefits from improved cash flow, reduced accounts receivable, increased patient satisfaction, reduced returns, and more sales,” Silance says. “The patient has an easy, affordable way to immediately get the care they need and conveniently pay over time with a payment that fits within their budget.” Further information is available by contacting Terry Silance at 800/300-3046, ext. 4172, or [email protected].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Hearing JournalSame topicFirm Innovation and GrowthFrench-language works237,207