MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327789123 · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2014-0065

Urinary ACE2 in healthy adults and patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes

2014· article· en· W2327789123 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
David Z.I. Cherney, Fengxia Xiao, Joseph Zimpelmann, Ronnie Har, Vesta Lai, James W. Scholey, Heather N. Reich, Kevin D. Burns

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenin-Angiotensin System Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaDiabetes CanadaUniversity of TorontoOttawa HospitalUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsUrinary systemInternal medicineEndocrinologyRenin–angiotensin systemMedicineDiabetes mellitusAngiotensin-converting enzyme 2Type 1 diabetesKidneyBlood pressureCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is expressed in the kidney and may be renoprotective. We determined whether urinary ACE2 enzyme activity and protein levels (ELISA), as well as angiotensinogen and ACE, are elevated during clamped euglycemia (4-6 mmol·L(-1)) in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes (T1D, n = 58) compared with normoglycemic controls (n = 21). We also measured the effect of clamped hyperglycemia (9-11 mmol·L(-1)) on each urinary factor in T1D patients. Urinary ACE2 activity and protein levels were higher during clamped euglycemia in T1D compared with the controls (p < 0.0001). In contrast, urinary angiotensinogen levels (p = 0.27) and ACE excretion (p = 0.68) did not differ. In response to clamped hyperglycemia in T1D, urinary ACE2 protein decreased (p < 0.0001), whereas urinary ACE2 activity as well as angiotensinogen and ACE levels remained unchanged. Urinary ACE2 activity and protein expression are increased in T1D patients prior to the onset of clinical complications. Further work is required to determine the functional role of urinary ACE2 in early T1D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesFrench-language works237,207