MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327863809 · doi:10.1021/om501191c

Aggregation-Induced Emission of Bis(imino)acenaphthene Zinc Complexes: Photophysical Tuning via Methylation of the Flanking Aryl Substituents

2015· article· en· W2327863809 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel A. Evans, Lucia Myongwon Lee, Ignacio Vargas‐Baca, Alan H. Cowley

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWelch Foundation
KeywordsChemistryAcenaphtheneStackingArylPhotoluminescenceZincPhosphorescenceLuminescenceCrystallographyCrystal structureIntermolecular forcePhotochemistryPhenanthreneMoleculeFluorescenceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bis(imino)acenaphthene zinc complexes with methylated aryl substituents have been examined from the standpoint of their photoluminescent properties. Although complexes 1 – 4 proved to be nonemissive in solution, complexes 1 and 2 were found to emit via an aggregation-induced emission pathway. On the other hand, complexes 3 and 4 were found to be nonemissive in the solid state. Detailed crystallographic studies of complexes 1 – 4 provided valuable insights into the structural differences between the emissive ( 1 and 2 ) and nonemissive complexes ( 3 and 4 ), particularly with respect to their molecular structures and crystal-packing environments. TD-DFT theoretical calculations were carried out and were found to support the hypothesis that the phosphorescent emissions of 1 and 2 are due to the existence of intermolecular π-stacking interactions within the crystal lattices. Finally, a series of solvatomorphs of complexes 1 and 2 were synthesized and their emissive properties were studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207