MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327964514 · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31817e8acc

Inherited Thrombophilia and Pregnancy Complications Revisited

2008· article· en· W2327964514 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Rodger, Michael J. Paidas, Claire McLintock, Saskia Middeldorp, Susan R. Kahn, Ida Martinelli, William M. Hague, Karen Rosene Montella, Ian Greer

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrics and Gynecology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombophiliaPlacental abruptionPregnancyObstetricsPreeclampsiaLow molecular weight heparinPlacentaIntrauterine growth restrictionGynecologyHeparinFetusSurgeryThrombosisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inherited thrombophilias are not yet established as a cause of placenta-mediated pregnancy complications, such as fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, abruption, and pregnancy loss. An inherited thrombophilia is only one of many factors that lead to development of these diseases and is unlikely to be the unique factor that should drive management in subsequent pregnancies. The paucity of evidence for benefit, coupled with a small potential for harm, suggests that low molecular weight heparin should be considered an experimental drug for these indications until data from controlled trials are published. At present, women with a history of placenta-mediated pregnancy complications, with or without a thrombophilia, should be followed closely without routine prophylactic low molecular weight heparin other than for prevention of venous thromboembolism in limited circumstances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations141
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrics and GynecologySame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207