MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract LB-140: Targeting brain tumour initiating cells using a dual-pronged approach of oncolytic virotherapy and chemotherapeutics

2012· article· en· W2328183592 on OpenAlexaff
Brienne McKenzie, Franz J. Zemp, Xueqing Lun, Aru Narendran, Grant McFadden, Ebba U. Kurz, Peter Forsyth

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncolytic virusCancer researchSynthetic lethalityVirotherapyBiologyMedicineDNA repairGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Brain tumour initiating cells (BTICs) are stem-like cells hypothesized to mediate tumorigenesis and recurrence in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Patient-derived BTICs represent highly relevant preclinical GBM models, forming aggressive, infiltrative tumours in nude mice that closely recapitulate the phenotypic heterogeneity of patient GBMs. BTICs have also been shown to possess mechanisms mediating both chemo- and radio-resistance. Recently, success has been demonstrated in treating BTICs with oncolytic virotherapy (OV), which uses replication-competent viruses to specifically target and kill malignant cells. Myxoma virus (MyxV) is a promising oncolytic candidate, which our lab has shown to be highly efficacious in preclinical GBM models, effectively curing GBM xenografts with a single intra-cranial injection. By contrast, long-term survival is not obtained in MyxV-treated, BTIC-tumour-bearing mice, though survival is prolonged. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that MyxV treatment of BTICs can be improved by utilizing clinically relevant chemotherapeutics identified via high-throughput pharmacoviral screens. RESULTS: We utilized a diverse, comprehensive panel of 80 small molecule inhibitors with preclinical and clinical anti-cancer efficacy to screen for synergy with MyxV treatment in vitro. Multiple candidates have been identified and are currently being validated for synergy (Chou-Talalay method) using a panel of genetically distinct, patient-derived BTICs. Our results implicate multiple potential targets for OV combination therapy, including topoisomerase I and the PI-3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Target validation is currently underway using shRNA knockdowns and additional targeted inhibitors of these pathways. Further, the mechanism of synergistic cell death during these combination treatments is being explored. In vivo experiments utilizing the dual-pronged pharmacoviral approach are also underway. SIGNIFICANCE: We describe the nature and identity of compounds that carry the potential to sensitize BTICs to MyxV infection. Our findings offer an effective avenue to elucidate resistance mechanisms and develop efficacious combination therapies for targeting disease reservoirs within highly refractory GBMs. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-140. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-LB-140

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→