MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328189872 · doi:10.1515/jpem.2005.18.9.859

MC4R Marker Associated with Stature in Children and Young Adults: A Longitudinal Study

2005· article· en· W2328189872 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicola Santoro, Tuomo Rankinen, Louis Përusse, Ruth J. F. Loos, Claude Bouchard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBody mass indexAnthropometryAlleleLocus (genetics)Polymorphism (computer science)Internal medicineGenotypeAllele frequencyEndocrinologyDemographyGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the associations between a polymorphism in the melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) gene and changes in body size and composition from childhood to adulthood in the Québec Family Study. Ninety-one subjects (43 males) less than 18 years of age (mean age 13.5 +/- 2.4 years; range 8.4-17.8 years) at baseline were re-measured 11.2 years later on average. The anthropometric variables analyzed were height, weight, body mass index, percent body fat, sum of skinfolds, fat mass index, and fat free mass index (FFMI). All variables were adjusted for age and sex. The subjects were genotyped for the MC4R C-2745T polymorphism. Forty-five subjects were homozygotes for the common allele (C/C), 36 were heterozygotes (C/T) and 10 were homozygotes for the rare allele (T/T). The rare allele was associated with increased height at baseline as well as at the follow-up visit. Although FFMI tended to increase more in subjects carrying the rare allele, no significant differences were found for the changes over time for the other phenotypes. These results suggest that DNA sequence variation in the MC4R locus may contribute to the gain in body height from childhood to adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207