Architectural Transformations of Residential Buildings in Rural Areas of the Lublin Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to identify the basic changes in the architecture of residential buildings in the post-war period in one of the rural voivodeships (regions) of Poland.The authors aim to point out the reasons underlying the formation of new architectural models in rural areas and attempt to evaluate their impact on the transformation of the traditional landscape of the country.The study encompassed 15 villages located in different parts of the Lublin Voivodeship.The oldest houses, erected before the Second World War, were defined by their simplicity and paucity of decorative detail.Buildings were usually small, planked with wood and with a gabled roof.The use of natural building materials gave these buildings the feel of aesthetically blending into the rural landscape.Following the Second World War, a major change in quality took place in rural construction.Wood was replaced by rock-based building material.One-storey houses with gable roofs were predominant.Building models and patterns remained mostly unchanged with respect to traditional historical archetypes.From the 1960s to the 1980s, country building fell under the influence of urban standards.The proliferation of these architectural forms was spurred and reinforced by increasingly strong connections between the country and the city, mainly due to the rural population taking up work in the city.The last decade of the 20 th century saw a significant improvement in the quality of building materials and the aesthetic value of the buildings themselves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".