MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328204875 · doi:10.5603/cj.a2013.0053

Impact of methanol intoxication on the human electrocardiogram

2013· article· en· W2328204875 on OpenAlexaff
Zardasht Jaff, William F. McIntyre, Payam Yazdan-Ashoori, Adrián Baranchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPoisoning and overdose treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSinus tachycardiaInternal medicineVentricular tachycardiaCardiologyAnesthesiaElectrocardiographyQT intervalTachycardia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Methanol is a common commercial compound that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality with high levels of exposure. The purpose of this study was to describe electrocardiographic (ECG) changes associated with methanol intoxication. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted with data from Kingston General Hospital collected between 2006 and 2011. Patient data, including demographics, medications, and laboratory data were recorded. Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained and changes were noted in relation to timing and extent of methanol intoxication. RESULTS: Nine patients with a mean age of 45 years were analyzed. All patients ingested methanol orally and presented to hospital between < 1 to 25 h after ingestion. The mean plasma methanol concentration on admission was 49.8 mmol/L. A lower pH and higher plasma methanol concentration were associated with multiple ECG changes. On admission, ECG changes included sinus tachycardia (44%), PR prolongation (11%), QTc prolongation (22%) and non-specific T-wave changes (66%). One patient developed a type-1 Brugada ECG pattern. During their course in hospital, 7 patients required dialysis, 3 required mechanical ventilation, 3 developed visual impairment, and 1 died. All ECG changes normalized while in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Methanol intoxication can lead to several ECG changes with sinus tachycardia and non-specific T-wave changes being the most common. These changes were more prominent in cases of severe acidosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology JournalSame topicPoisoning and overdose treatmentsFrench-language works237,207