Stormwater Capture, Reuse, and Treatment for Multipurpose Benefits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stormwater can be a blessing or a curse, depending on how it is handled. The conservation and reuse of stormwater can serve to enhance an environment that is lacking in water, even if only during certain times of year. Thus, stormwater that may cause flooding or overburden a collection system can be converted to an asset. The treatment of stormwater using a natural system rather than processing through a wastewater treatment plant can save valuable resources by increasing the capacity and prolonging the useful life of a treatment plant. The reuse of the stormwater before it ever reaches the treatment plant will similarly save resources and can provide additional benefits to water-short end-users. Stormwater can be accessed as a new source of water for municipalities and private enterprises. Innovative approaches to divert and treat or capture and distribute include constructed-wetland stormwater treatment systems, small lot reuse, source reuse, stormwater capture, stormwater storage, and stormwater distribution. In most jurisdictions a water right is not required to use stormwater that is captured before it enters a natural stream or lake. Potential stormwater reclamation opportunities identified as part of an appraisal investigation conducted for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in the State of Hawaii are used to illustrate innovative approaches to converting stormwater to an asset. Example project concepts include stormwater interception and storage for addition to an existing irrigation distribution system on the Island of Hawaii, or installation of a deep infiltration trench to capture stormwater from urban development and introduce it into a brackish aquifer used for irrigation on Oahu. Similarly, a stormwater collection, treatment, and beneficial reuse system approach is illustrated by a Vancouver, Washington, project under development to treat industrial stormwater runoff in constructed wetlands for discharge to the Burnt Bridge Creek watershed. This provides an attractive alternative for industries and municipalities to reduce sewer collection and its associated costs and lost capacity. It also provides flow augmentation to the creek and restores watershed features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".