MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328211389 · doi:10.1061/40976(316)426

Stormwater Capture, Reuse, and Treatment for Multipurpose Benefits

2008· article· en· W2328211389 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Madison, Henriette Emond

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStormwaterEnvironmental scienceReuseEnvironmental planningEnvironmental engineeringWater resource managementSurface runoffWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stormwater can be a blessing or a curse, depending on how it is handled. The conservation and reuse of stormwater can serve to enhance an environment that is lacking in water, even if only during certain times of year. Thus, stormwater that may cause flooding or overburden a collection system can be converted to an asset. The treatment of stormwater using a natural system rather than processing through a wastewater treatment plant can save valuable resources by increasing the capacity and prolonging the useful life of a treatment plant. The reuse of the stormwater before it ever reaches the treatment plant will similarly save resources and can provide additional benefits to water-short end-users. Stormwater can be accessed as a new source of water for municipalities and private enterprises. Innovative approaches to divert and treat or capture and distribute include constructed-wetland stormwater treatment systems, small lot reuse, source reuse, stormwater capture, stormwater storage, and stormwater distribution. In most jurisdictions a water right is not required to use stormwater that is captured before it enters a natural stream or lake. Potential stormwater reclamation opportunities identified as part of an appraisal investigation conducted for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in the State of Hawaii are used to illustrate innovative approaches to converting stormwater to an asset. Example project concepts include stormwater interception and storage for addition to an existing irrigation distribution system on the Island of Hawaii, or installation of a deep infiltration trench to capture stormwater from urban development and introduce it into a brackish aquifer used for irrigation on Oahu. Similarly, a stormwater collection, treatment, and beneficial reuse system approach is illustrated by a Vancouver, Washington, project under development to treat industrial stormwater runoff in constructed wetlands for discharge to the Burnt Bridge Creek watershed. This provides an attractive alternative for industries and municipalities to reduce sewer collection and its associated costs and lost capacity. It also provides flow augmentation to the creek and restores watershed features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008Same topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207