First certain record of Hygrohypnum bestii (Ren. amp; Bryhn) Holz. ex Broth., for Eurasia (Russian Far East, Kamtchatka Peninsula)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Renauld and Bryhn (Renault, 1901) originally described Limnobium molle Dicks.ssp.bestii Ren.et Bryhn from Avalanche Basin, Montana, USA by a sterile collection of Holzinger.Williams (1901) considered it as a separated species and published records of a number of sterile collections from the United States and Canada.Holzinger (1901) placed this species in the genus Hygrohypnum, but he provided an invalid combination.Brotherus (1909) validated the combination of Hygrohypnum bestii in this genus.Grout (1931) and Wijk & al. (1962) considered H. bestii as a subspecies of H. molle.Lawton (1966) discovered sporophyte of H. bestii.On the basis of dioicous condition and structure of the inner perichaetial bracts of this species, she showed its species independence.Jamieson (1976) provided the detailed descri ption of this species, list of localities and its distributional map.According to him, H. bestii occurs only in North America, chiefly in its Western part, with few localities in the East.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".