Digestive performance in neonatal Southern Pacific Rattlesnakes (<i>Crotalus oreganus helleri</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite significant research on the metabolic characteristics of digestion in adult snakes, the digestive performance of neonatal snakes is poorly characterized. We examined the energetic costs associated with digestion and the energetic profit derived from the first meal eaten by neonatal Southern Pacific Rattlesnakes ( Crotalus oreganus helleri Meek, 1905). Composition of venom of C. o. helleri changes through ontogeny, becoming richer in proteolytic components that are hypothesized by some to enhance the rate of digestion. Therefore, we also investigated whether venom type (proteolytic-component-rich “adult” versus neurotoxin-rich “neonate” venom) affected digestive performance. We examined specific dynamic action (SDA), apparent assimilation efficiency, rate of digestion, and gut passage time in snakes fed prey killed with either “adult” or “neonate” venom at 22 and 30 °C. Although digestion progressed more quickly at 30 °C compared with 22 °C, there were no significant differences in digestion rate or assimilation efficiency owing to venom type; however, our statistical power was limited by small sample size. Despite the lack of “digestive experience”, the apparent assimilation efficiency was remarkably high (mean of 92%) and greater than published values for Crotalinae species. Based on these results, we hypothesize that neonatal C. o. helleri make a big energetic profit from their first meal by digesting efficiently and economically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".