MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328418522 · doi:10.1021/om300108p

Factors Favoring Efficient Bifunctional Catalysis. Study of a Ruthenium(II) Hydrogenation Catalyst Containing an N-Heterocyclic Carbene with a Primary Amine Donor

2012· article· en· W2328418522 on OpenAlexafffund
Wylie W. N. O, Alan J. Lough, Robert H. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryRutheniumHydrideCarbeneMedicinal chemistryPincer ligandPyridinePhosphineLigand (biochemistry)NucleophileCoordination sphereKetoneBifunctionalPhotochemistryCatalysisMoleculeOrganic chemistryPincer movementHydrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An alcohol-assisted outer-sphere bifunctional mechanism is proposed for the H 2 hydrogenation of ketones catalyzed by the ruthenium(II) precatalyst [RuCp*(C–NH 2 )py]PF 6 ( 2; Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienyl ligand, C–NH 2 = N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) with a tethered primary amine donor, py = pyridine) when activated by an alkoxide base. It has a high activity (turnover frequency (TOF) of up to 17 600 h –1 ) and selectivity for the H 2 hydrogenation of ketones at 25 °C and 8 bar of H 2 pressure in the presence of alcohols. Computational studies of a model neutral ruthenium(II) hydride amine complex, RuCp(C–NH 2 )H (Cp = cyclopentadienyl ligand), using density functional theory (DFT) methods reveal a low free energy barrier for the transfer of a proton/hydride couple to the ketone in the outer coordination sphere. In contrast, the related iridium(III) hydride amine complex [IrCp(C–NH 2 )H] + is predicted to have a high barrier for hydride transfer to the ketone due to the poor nucleophilicity of this cationic hydride. A 2-propanol molecule acts as a proton shuttle in the heterolytic splitting of the η 2 -H 2 ligand on ruthenium according to deuterium labeling and computational studies. The carbonyl stretching wavenumbers of the complexes [RuCp*(D–NH 2 )CO]X, including the new complexes [RuCp*(C–NH 2 )CO]PF 6 ( 4 ) and [RuCp*(P–NH 2 )CO]PF 6 ( 5; P–NH 2 = 2-(diphenylphosphino)benzylamine), decrease as D is changed in the order phosphine, NHC, 2′-pyridine, amine. Thus, the NHC complex 2 is more electron rich and more active as a hydrogenation catalyst than the phosphine complex [RuCp*(P–NH 2 )py]PF 6 ( 3 ). We conclude that complex 2 outperforms other ruthenium(II) NHC complexes and some other phosphine–amine complexes for the H 2 hydrogenation of ketones due to the following factors: (1) the ease of formation of a highly reactive neutral hydride, (2) the presence of an NH 2 donor ligand required for bifunctional catalysis, and (3) the presence of an NHC donor to achieve the right balance of hydricity of the metal hydride and acidity of the protic amine group for the efficient H + /H – transfer to the polar double bond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207