Acute bioprosthetic thrombosis immediately after aortic valve replacement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the case of a 72-year-old woman referred for dyspnea and vertigo when admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of aortic stenosis. She had hypertension with previous deep venous thrombosis with no known hypercoagulable diathesis. She underwent aortic valve replacement with a Carpentier-Magna bioprosthesis without intraoperative complications; selective cardioplegia before aortic wall suture confirmed that coronary ostia were free. After extracorporeal circulation weaning, an episode of ventricular fibrillation occurred; sinus rhythm was restored using 20 J shock. Considering new episodes of ventricular fibrillation, the increasing number of polymorph ectopic ventricular systoles and the worsening of patient condition despite the use of high doses of inotropes, an intra-aortic balloon pump 1: 1 was inserted via the right femoral artery. Echocardiography (ECG) did not show alteration of the bioprosthesis in the presence of severe left ventricular impairment (ejection fraction <30%) with ipokinesia of the anterior-lateral wall and moderate-severe mitral regurgitation. Considering the rapid decline of the patient's condition despite the use of high doses of inotropes and an intra-aortic balloon pump, the aortic wall was reopened to control bioprosthesis. The intraoperative finding was unexpected; a thrombus of length 3-4 cm was found, attached to the prosthetic annulus and protruding into the left main trunk. The thrombus was immediately sucked up to avoid coronary embolization and, after that, the prosthesis was replaced with a Mitroflow 19 (Sorin Group Inc, Mitroflow Division, Vancouver, Canada) bioprosthesis. Probably, an association between factors could induce thrombosis-like aortic sinuses: annulus dimensions, endothelium damage caused during decalcification, tears in the bioprosthetic sewing ring, unknown coagulation diathesis and the structure of the Carpentier-Magna support may have induced this very unusual complication. However, we do not have enough information to establish with certainty the causes of this complication, but discussion of this topic may be useful.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".