MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328490207 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2012-0083

Barrovian metamorphism in the central Kootenay Arc, British Columbia: petrology and isograd geometry

2013· article· en· W2328490207 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
David P. Moynihan, David R.M. Pattison

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMetamorphismSillimaniteIsogradMetamorphic rockAndalusiteKyaniteMetamorphic faciesStaurolitePyropeGeochemistryBiotiteFault (geology)DomingCretaceousPetrologyFaciesPaleontologyTectonicsQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A narrow, partly fault-bounded belt of Barrovian amphibolite facies rocks transects the central Kootenay Arc in the internal zone of the southeastern Canadian Cordillera. The following zones of increasing metamorphic grade are recognised in metapelites: chlorite/biotite, garnet, staurolite, kyanite, sillimanite, and sillimanite + K-feldspar. The garnet and higher-grade zones outline two joined domains: a N- to NNE-trending curved belt, >100 km long and 5–20 km wide, that is approximately parallel to the strike of stratigraphic units; and a SSE-trending belt, >70 km long and 10–15 km wide, that transects strike. Isograds in the N–NNE-trending belt outline an elongate bull’s-eye pattern with highest-grade rocks in the centre, coincident with the position of a structural culmination. Isogradic surfaces have an elongate domal form centred around this culmination. Rocks in the kyanite and sillimanite zones were metamorphosed at ~25 km (∼7 kbar (1 kbar = 100 MPa)) and >650 °C during Early Cretaceous crustal thickening; rocks in the garnet zone experienced peak temperature conditions (∼500 °C) at lower pressure, suggesting the piezothermic array for the belt has a positive slope. The western flank of the N- to NNE-trending belt is cut by the west-dipping Gallagher fault zone (GFZ), whereas the eastern boundary of the SSE-trending fork is marked by the Purcell Trench fault (PTF). These Palaeocene–Eocene normal faults truncate Early Cretaceous isogradic surfaces and juxtapose regions with contrasting structural and metamorphic histories. Low-grade rocks in the hanging wall of the GFZ underwent peak regional metamorphism during the Early–Middle Jurassic, prior to intrusion of the 159–173 Ma Nelson batholith at a depth of ∼12–14 km. With the exception of a zone along the southern “tail” of the Nelson batholith, rocks in the hanging wall of the GFZ were not affected by Cretaceous metamorphism or penetrative deformation. Rocks in the amphibolite-facies belt yield Palaeocene–Eocene K–Ar and 40Ar/39Ar mica cooling ages, whereas K–Ar biotite ages in the hanging wall of the GFZ record Jurassic – Early Cretaceous cooling, and those in the hanging wall of the PTF are mid-Cretaceous. Although the GFZ and PTF accommodated differential exhumation during the Palaeogene, significant relief on isogradic surfaces was established prior to normal faulting, during Early Cretaceous metamorphism and deformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207