MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328604088 · doi:10.1139/v11-025

Phosphorus-31 and vanadium-51 solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of β-vanadyl phosphate — Effects of homo- and heteronuclear spin-spin, electrostatic, and paramagnetic interactions

2011· article· en· W2328604088 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Klaus Eichele, Arnd‐Rüdiger Grimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryElectric field gradientHeteronuclear moleculeHomonuclear moleculeMagic angle spinningSolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceParamagnetismPhosphorus-31 NMR spectroscopyNMR spectra databaseNuclear magnetic resonanceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)QuadrupoleSpin (aerodynamics)AnisotropyNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyCrystallographySpectral lineCondensed matter physicsAtomic physicsStereochemistryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field-dependent 31 P solid-state NMR studies demonstrate that the line shape in spectra of β-VOPO 4 depends on 51 V– 31 P direct and indirect spin-spin interactions (M 2 ( 51 V, 31 P) = 101(23) × 10 6 rad 2 s –2 , 2 J iso ( 51 V, 31 P) = 48(5) Hz) and, to a lesser extent, on 31 P chemical shift anisotropy (δ iso = –10.4(2), Ω = δ 11 – δ 33 = 22(2) ppm) and 31 P– 31 P interactions (M 2 ( 31 P, 31 P) = 6.7(1) × 10 6 rad 2 s –2 ). In contrast, homonuclear dipolar interactions play an important role for the field and spinning rate dependent 31 P spin-lattice relaxation via paramagnetic impurities (T 1 = 20–60 s). Vanadium-51 magic-angle spinning NMR spectra indicate a sizeable chemical shift anisotropy (δ iso = –754(1), δ 11 = –336(10), δ 22 = –344(6), δ 33 = –1581(8) ppm) and nuclear quadrupole interaction (χ = 1.5(1) MHz, η = 0.35(5)); the principal axis systems of both interactions are clearly not coincident, with an angle of 35(5)° between the greatest component of the electric field gradient tensor and δ 33 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicTransition Metal Oxide NanomaterialsFrench-language works237,207