Bibliographic record
Abstract
A s TE REALITY of polycentrism replaces the myth of the monolithic Communist world, the diverse policy orientations of the Communist nations take on added significance. North Korea, officially known as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, has slowly emerged in recent years as one of the more industrialized nations of the Socialist orbit. Backed by its steadily growing economic power, it has also begun assert an appreciable measure of autonomy in the arena of international Communist politics. What follows is an attempt trace the path that it has traveled in reaching its present status of relative independence. If there is a single Korean word which sums up North Korea's national preoccupation today, it is probably chuch'e-a word which has been variously translated as autonomy,' independence,2 theme,3 and subjective entity.4 As far as can be determined, the word made its first appearance in a speech made by Premier Kim Il-song before a group of propaganda and agitation workers of the Korean Workers' Party (KWP) on December 28, I955.5 In the speech, Kim reminded his audience that the ideological work of the KWP must be geared the peculiar requirements of the Korean He declared that the study of the history of Russian Communism, the Chinese Revolution, and the general principles of Marxism-Leninism had but one purpose: to enable us more correctly execute our own revolution. Deploring the failure of the Korean Communists study Korean history and culture in any systematic way, Kim stated:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".