MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328645295 · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1546560

Preoperative Edema and Immediate Postoperative Tumor Bed Hemorrhage are Predictors of Intracranial Meningioma Recurrence following Surgical Resection

2015· article· en· W2328645295 on OpenAlexaff
George Klironomos, Shervin Taslimi, Alireza Mansouri, Alexandra Kilian, Osaama H. Khan, Fred Gentili, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgical resectionResectionMeningiomaEdemaCerebral edemaSurgeryBrain edemaIntracranial tumorRadiologyAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study aims to identify perioperative radiological factors that would be predictive of meningioma recurrence following surgical resection. Methods: A retrospective hospital-based study of all the patients assessed at our institution from January 1990 to June 2014 for surgical resection of meningiomas was conducted. The database constituted both, patients with a first time presentation of meningiomas (90%) and those with evidence of recurrence (10%). Information regarding background demographic data, perioperative imaging parameters such as peritumoral edema or postoperative hemorrhage or residual, and pathological characteristics of the resected lesions were collected. Linear and volumetric measurements (of both tumor volume and volume of edema) were collected as well. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis were conducted using STATA v11.0 software. Results: Overall, 464 patients were reviewed; n = 154 (34%) patients were male. Overall, 44 cases (8.8%) represented prior recurrences whereas the remainder represented primary presentations. Among intracranial tumors, 296 (74.6%) were grade I, 78 (19.6%) grade II, and 23 (5.8%) grade III. Postoperative tumor bed hemorrhage, noted in 119 (29.9%) of cases, and peritumoral edema volume before resection were significant predictors of tumor recurrence following resection at our institution ( p = 0.002 and 0.037, respectively). These parameters did not correlate with the MIB-1 index, tumor residual, the grade of the tumor, or primary versus recurrent presentation. Multivariate cox regression modelling of total recurrence was comprised of postoperative tumor bed hemorrhage ( p = 0.045) and peritumoral edema volume ( p = 0.029). Conclusion: Preoperative peritumoral edema and postoperative tumor bed hemorrhage are radiological factors that are predictive of tumor recurrence, independently of other markers of tumor activity and proliferation. Identification of other molecular and genetic tumors markers associated with these findings can supplement known markers in the prediction of tumor behavior and recurrence patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull BaseSame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207