MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328693284 · doi:10.1021/ct200356b

Diabatization Schemes for Generating Charge-Localized Electron–Proton Vibronic States in Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Systems

2011· article· en· W2328693284 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrew Sirjoosingh, Sharon Hammes‐Schiffer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDiabaticAtomic physicsProtonProton-coupled electron transferChemistryReaction coordinatePhysicsVibronic spectroscopyElectronVibronic couplingAdiabatic processQuantum mechanicsExcited stateComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A scheme for the rigorous construction of charge-localized diabatic electron-proton vibronic states for proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions is presented. The diabatic electronic states are calculated using an adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation designed to ensure that the first-order nonadiabatic couplings with respect to a specified one-dimensional reaction coordinate vanish exactly. This scheme is applied to both symmetric and asymmetric PCET systems with several different one-dimensional reaction coordinates, including the hydrogen transfer coordinate, a normal mode coordinate, and the intrinsic reaction coordinate. This approach is also extended to describe the three-dimensional motion of the transferring hydrogen. The diabatic electronic states exhibit relatively invariant charge distributions along the reaction coordinate and are in excellent agreement with the analogous states obtained from the generalized Mulliken-Hush and Boys localization methods. Furthermore, these diabatic electronic states are combined with the associated proton vibrational wave functions to generate charge-localized electron-proton vibronic states that describe one- or three-dimensional hydrogen motion. These electron-proton vibronic states can be used to calculate the vibronic couplings, rate constants, and kinetic isotope effects of PCET reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Theory and ComputationSame topicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207