MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328761248 · doi:10.1115/gt2011-45259

Intercooled-Recuperated Gas-Turbine-Cycle Engine Coupled With Pneumatic Motor With Quasi-Isothermal Heat Addition

2011· article· en· W2328761248 on OpenAlexaff
Branko Stanković

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustorExternal combustion engineHeat enginePiston (optics)RecuperatorCombustion chamberMechanical engineeringInternal combustion engineCombined cycleCombustionIsothermal processThermodynamic cycleGas compressorThermodynamicsMaterials scienceMechanicsTurbineEngineeringHeat exchangerChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hybrid energy system has been proposed, consisting of an intercooled-recuperated gas-turbine-cycle engine coupled with a pneumatic motor (compressed-air engine), using reciprocating linear motion of a piston or a rotary vane motor, with quasi-isothermal heat addition process. Both gas-turbine (GT) engine and pneumatic motor have their own and separate combustion processes, occurring serially one after another, owing to the fact that in the GT engine exhaust gas there is still enough oxygen needed for combustion of fuel (liquid or gaseous) in an internal combustion engine. The quasi-isothermal nature of the heat addition process within the pneumatic motor is a result of averaging of the two thermodynamic processes, simultaneously interconnected within a cylinder-piston motor: isobaric heat addition and adiabatic gas expansion. The final expansion pressure at the end of the pneumatic-motor quasi-isothermal heat addition/expansion process is considered to correspond to the initial specific volume of inlet ambient air. Three (3) possible configurations of such a hybrid energy system were analyzed, differing only in the sequence of equipment connecting in the direction of air/working-gas flow (GT-cycle combustor, GT, pneumatic motor with combustor and recuperator). The results showed that the most efficient cycle configuration is No. 2, in which quasi-isothermal heat addition / gas expansion in the pneumatic motor occurs right after the GT-cycle heat addition in the associated GT-cycle combustor, then the partly expanded combustion gas first cools down in the GT-cycle recuperator, prior to its final expansion in the GT and exhaust to atmosphere. Estimated overall cycle thermal efficiency for the system configuration #2 ranges from ∼62% for a maximum GT/pneumatic motor inlet temperature of 1500 K (1227°C or 2240°F) to ∼66% for a maximum GT/pneumatic motor inlet temperature of 1700 K (1427°C or 2600°F), assuming a purely isothermal heat addition/expansion process in the pneumatic-motor cylinder. This is likely due to the fact that there is no necessity to cool the low-temperature GT of this configuration. Overall cycle thermal efficiency increases with the ambient temperature decrease for any cycle configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and EnginesFrench-language works237,207